.

Council Tones Down Anti-Prop 32 Measure

The El Cerrito City Council agreed to amend its resolution against Prop 32, a state measure on political spending, after Mayor Bill Jones said "rhetoric and rancor" in the proposed draft were not proper for council pronouncements.

Items on the "consent calendar" of the El Cerrito City Council typically are non-controversial and are passed collectively as a group without amendment or discussion.

So it was somewhat unusual when Mayor Bill Jones pulled one of the nine consent calender items from Tuesday's consent calendar – a resolution expressing council opposition to state Proposition 32, a measure on the Nov. 6 ballot that critics call an attempt by conservative corporate interests to block political spending by unions. 

Propriety of language quetioned

Jones objected to the tone and language of the measure, not its underlying message. He said he was certainly opposed to Prop 32, calling it "nothing more than a transparent attempt to undermine, control and greatly reduce the rights to organize and negotiate labor terms and conditions."

But, he said, the council "represents the image of the community" and its "resolutions and proclamations – the formal and official records of city business – must reflect the proper professional decorum expected by the community."

So he proposed several changes in the wording "in order to eliminate unnecessary rhetoric and rancor while still providing responsible reasoning for our actions," he said.

He called for removing "ultra-conserative" from the clause saying the measure had been placed on the ballot by the "ultra-conservative Lincoln Club of Orange County."

He suggested removing a clause saying Prop 32 "is more appropriately called the 'Special Exemptions Act.'" 

In a sentence saying Prop 32 targets "the voices of everyday working people," he recommended saying it targets "the rights of working people." He also recommended other changes.

"I feel these changes will reflect the proper standard for formal presentations that El Cerrito City Councils have always strived to maintain in the city's official documents," Jones said.

Councilwoman Ann Cheng, who had proposed the resolution, said she found all the changes acceptable, and the council passed the amended resolution unanimously.

Prop 32 supporters say it not only prohibits unions from using payroll deductions for political purposes but also bans unions and corporations alike from contributing to political campaigns. Opponents say it provides loopholes for corporate political spending.

A mark-up version of the amended council resolution, showing all the delections and additions, is attached to this article.

Measures E and G endorsed

The council also voted unanimously – without comment as part of the consent calendar approval – to endorse two property tax measures to raise money for the West Contra Costa Costa Unified School District, which includes El Cerrito schools. 

One is Measure E, a $380-million, long-term bond program, to replace or upgrade school facilities. It would add an estimated $48 per $100,000 of assessed valuation. 

Measure E needs approval of 55 percent of the voters to pass. The tax would be added to existing taxes on West County property tax bills from five previous school facility bond measures, totaling $1.23 billion, passed by voters since 1998.

The other measure endorsed by the council is Measure G, an extension of the current parcel tax that funds academic programs in schools. It requires a two-thirds yes vote to pass.

The current parcel tax is 7.2 cents per surface square foot of building area and expires June 30, 2014. Measure G would also be 7.2 cents per square foot and last five years, beginning July 1, 2013.

-----------------------------------------------

Don't miss any hometown news. Get the day's headlines and events – plus any breaking news alerts – by subscribing to the El Cerrito Patch email newsletter.

Beth Weil September 19, 2012 at 07:53 PM
"One is Measure E, a $380-million, long-term bond program, to replace or upgrade school facilities. It would add an estimated $48 per $100,000 of assessed valuation." It seems like every ballot has a school improvement bond. How much do homeowners contribute currently to the schools? How much is too much?
Charles Burress September 28, 2012 at 12:45 AM
My latest El Cerrito property tax bill (2012-13) shows seven taxes or assessments for the West Contra Costa Unified School District. Five of them are bonds going back to 1998, totaling $215.70 per $100,000 of net assessed valuation (if my math is correct). The proposed Measure E would add another $48 per $100,000 of assessed value. In addition we pay a parcel tax to WCCUSD of 7.2 cents per square foot of building area, which would be extended by Measure G. The seventh item is identified simply as "WCCUSD Assessment" on our property tax bills, a flat $72 per household. I've been trying to find out from the school district what this is, but haven't been successful so far.
Denise Sangster September 28, 2012 at 04:19 AM
19% of my current tax bill is for public education. I am 100% in support of public education, but I want to understand why the district needs seven and now they want at least one or two more. How many does it need to run the District? I know California's finances are a mess, but how is it that other Districts receive the same level of funding and have significantly fewer assessments. Can someone explain this to me?
Milan Moravec October 02, 2012 at 03:09 AM
The public’s University of California harvests family savings, Alumni donations, supporter’s money and taxes. Cal. ranked #1 public university total academic cost (resident) as a result of the Provost’s, Chancellor’s ‘charge resident’s higher tuition’. UCB tuition is rising faster than other universities. Cal ranked # 2 nationally in faculty earning potential. Spending on salaries increased 29% in last six years. Believe it: Harvard College less costly. University of California negates promise of equality of opportunity: access, affordability. Self-absorbed Provost Breslauer Chancellor Birgeneau are outspoken on ‘charging residents much higher’ tuition. Birgeneau ($450,000) Breslauer ($306,000) like to blame the politicians, since they stopped giving them their entitled funding. The ‘charge instate students higher tuition’ skyrocketed fees by an average 14% per year from 2006 to 2011 academic years. If they had allowed fees to rise at the same rate of inflation over past 10 years fees would still be in reach of middle income students. Breslauer Birgeneau increase disparities in higher education, defeat the promise of equality of opportunity, and create a less-educated work force. Additional state tax funding must sunset

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »