.
Feedback

Council to Consider Stricter Behavior Rules at Recycling Center

An El Cerrito staff report says "common sense" rules for Recycling Center patrons aren't working. Staff asks the City Council to approve "enforceable rules" limiting time spent at the facility and requiring a permit to salvage

On the El Cerrito City Council agenda for Tuesday night is a staff request to approve stricter, enforceable rules for patron conduct at the city's new Recycling Center.

The new rules would limit parking at the facility to half an hour and time spent at the center to two hours. They would also require patrons to obtain staff permission to remove any items from recycling bins, with a permit required for salvaging certain non-hazardous items for reuse. No permit would be allowed for resale of items.

Permits would not be required to remove items from the Book Exchange or Exchange Zone. The current rule of not taking more than one file box worth of items from the Book/Exchange Zone would remain.

A staff report from the manager of the Recycling Center, Environmental Analyst Garth Schultz, says the "common sense rules" that were posted when the rebuilt facility opened in April have failed to stop complaints about continuing abuses.

The report cites the following activities as the main sources of complaints:

   • Users of the book exchange taking too many books and being aggressive

   • People taking materials from recycling collection bins

   • People getting on, or into, recycling bins or entering restricted staff areas

   • People parking or staying in the facility for many hours or all day

   • Groups of people loitering and taking recyclable materials from other patrons 

Police could be summoned if needed to enforce the new rules, and violatioins would be subject to criminal prosecution, the report says.

The city not only wants to preserve civility and safety at the recycling center but also to balance two conflicting goals: maxmizing city revenue from selling recyled items brought to the center and diverting materials from the waste stream into reuse when possible, according to the report.

The salvage permits "would be issued on an annual basis for legitimate reuse (not resale) of certain items including, but not limited to, art projects, school projects, landscaping projects, building projects, etc.," according to the report.

The draft Rules of Conduct contained in the report are:

SUPERVISE your children and leave pets at home

NOTIFY STAFF of any issues and call 911 in an emergency

NO LOITERING – Limit daily visitation to 2 hours total, maximum

NO DUMPING – Place accepted items in designated areas only

DO NOT park over 30 minutes at a time within this facility

DO NOT get in or move any equipment or enter staff areas

DO NOT take items from drop-off areas, patrons, or vehicles without City permission or as designated
   * Exchange Zone, Packaging, Bicycle, and Planter Pot areas exempt from this provision
   * See staff for more details regarding permitted salvage activities

DO NOT take more than one file box of items per day from the Exchange Zone

Failure to comply with these rules may result in action per ECMC 8.12.040, 8.12.140, 10.60.010, and CPC 602(l).  

TRESSPASSING & LOITERING PROHIBITED BY LAW

AREA UNDER 24 HOUR VIDEO SURVEILLANCE 

The report also includes a revised city ordinance authorizing the city to adopt the new rules and a copy of the salvage permit application. No fee is named for the application. The permit instructions say, "Applicant shall pay an application fee as provided in the city's master fee schedule, if one is established."

The report is attached to this article. The City Council meeting begins at 7 p.m.

------------------------

For other ways to connect with El Cerrito Patch, "like" us on Facebook and “follow” us on Twitter

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from El Cerrito Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
gretchen davidson May 16, 2013 at 02:50 pm
Was that what i heard in the middle of the night on Wednesday? I thought i was dreaming. It soundedRead More like some sort of loudspeaker.
Robin M. Blind May 15, 2013 at 09:16 pm
Gee...are you SURE that alarm IS coming from Portola Middle School? Um...I suppose that you ARERead More sure! Yes...it IS turbo-annoying but I had assumed that it was some stupid car alarm.
Dorothy Coakley April 8, 2013 at 08:02 pm
Good thought, Julian.
Julian April 8, 2013 at 11:32 am
I've spoken with him, he is educated, intelligent and articulate. He is also angry and sometimesRead More irrational. I dont know his story but his "street art" stands on its own legs. If you would like to help him, and yourself, buy and enjoy his art.
Rita Wilson April 7, 2013 at 09:51 pm
A neighbor of mine on Colusa tried to give him food when he was on Colusa, but he refused, so IRead More never tried. Dorothy, is that the shelter near the Berkeley Historical Society/Veteran's Building? Perhaps he would need a ride to it. Perhaps he's concerned about leaving his things there if he can't be there during the day. I'm afraid I don't know enough about it.
Dorothy Coakley March 27, 2013 at 04:36 pm
I did mention that I'm donating 10% of my royalties for "Midnight" to the EC's Open SpaceRead More fund, didn't I? I'm a Down-home Ten Percenter.
Dorothy Coakley March 27, 2013 at 04:31 pm
Lucy, I like the idea in principal, but in reality I think it would just give ECPD more work to do.Read More "People hanging out" doesn't necessarily translate to a friendly,fun-filled, folksy kind of environment. It *can* mean quite the reverse. "Midnight On the Ohlone" sounds like a new recording. Something like "I left my little babeeeeee, down by the tracks....and now I want her back....she's a needle in the haaaaaaay staaaaack...' Arhoolie awaits.
Lucy March 27, 2013 at 12:58 pm
What a great idea for pocket parks!!! I am all for them. Instead of spening a big amount on oneRead More (which we don't have space anyway), I would like to see many mini parks of $20,000 along the Bart tracks. With more visibility and people hanging out, it would make Bart paths safer too, especially the one around fairmont park. Really mini pocket parks just needs some play structures, benches and tables there.
George McRae May 2, 2013 at 06:47 pm
Part Two..... If you are fortunate to own a TV and watch the flood of video of robberies atRead More convenience stores you can easily see that the cameras did nothing to prevent the crimes. The Tsarnaev brothers went to an ATM, all of which have cameras and made no attempt to cover their identity. I’m just saying that if indeed one wants to stem crime one needs to think it through instead of jumping to a wild-west position. art
George McRae May 2, 2013 at 06:46 pm
Part One And of course with all the cameras at the Safeway, it has done so much to stop all theRead More ongoing crime there......So what is the discussion about here? Preventing street crime, or politically/religiously motivated terrorist crime? The article is a classic "Let's titillate with a banner about Islamic extremist jihad bombers, but the body will be about thug crime." These are two completely different issues and as such the author ought to go back and rethink this. It’s an irresponsible article. El Cerrito certainly has a thug crime problem that includes burglary and car theft break-ins. El Cerrito is not on ANYBODY's political map. Most native born Bay Area reisdents can’t find it on a map let alone a lunatic bent on making a martyr’s statement, Islamic , Christian or otherwise. If you look at the other crime headlines in the patch page you will see that were robberies also on the BART path, Sketchers, and Denny’s all of which are heavily “surveilled”. The Tsarnaev brothers are young enough to completely know that everyone and their grandmother has a picture phone, and cameras are everywhere in Boston, and YET they did what they did. SO… to “blanket statement” that all this camera surveillance has stopped the “perps” is simple thinking at best. It is helpful in solving crimes AFTER the fact.
John Stashik May 1, 2013 at 05:30 am
That was one crime that caused then-Chief Kirkland to push for the new law. Another question wouldRead More be: how many crimes have been prevented because certain businesses are required to have video recording? Perps know they're on camera in EC.