Text-Messaging: Curse or Creative Writing for Students?
The fast, compressed writing favored by the texting generation of students can be the ally, not the bane, of parents and teachers, says education professional Evie Groch of El Cerrito.
Let’s face it. As much as you may like or dislike students texting, it’s here to stay and even being used more and more by adults. According to a survey of 700 students aged 12 to 17 by the Pew Internet & American Life Project, 85 percent of the responders reported using a form of electronic communication. Sixty-four percent admitted using a shorthand native to texting.
Can you translate this text-speak?
- IDK
- SMH
- BTW
- POS
- *$
(Answers: I don’t know; shaking my head; by the way; parents over shoulder; Starbucks)
Fourth and fifth grade students text, use Facebook and Twitter, and email as a last resort. Younger students will be introduced to these methods each year. Teachers and parents are rightfully concerned.
Some teachers are upset by texting because they have seen a decline in their students’ writing abilities. They do not capitalize, use punctuation, or spell correctly. Young teachers may see this and let it go because they expect it or use it themselves, but others are convinced it causes miscommunication and are out to eradicate or ban it and refer to it as “a dumbing down of culture.” I’m afraid this approach will not work and may encourage an underground messaging system.
A good compromise would be to have students and children prove to you that they can translate their text messages into Standard English. This also works for Second Language Learners and students of world languages. Adapting to various language and communication systems is a highly valued skill and allows students to navigate successfully in different societal venues. The use of Rap, Spanglish, and Ebonics may have a place, but successful students know that place is not on classroom and college papers. They are primed to see a difference between how they communicate socially with their friends and how they write their college essay. Adapting is a sign of an intelligent, educated student.
Texting has proven itself to be advantageous in several instances. When the plot of a novel or short story has to be succinctly stated and boiled down to one or two sentences, texting works. There are limits on how much you can say. When you’re expressing the theme of a book or summarizing an essay, brevity is desirable. Perhaps here is where a text message would work, as long as the student could also show its correct form in Standard English. Many teachers already communicate this way with students for homework. The teachers may sent out a text message and have students text back the message in Standard English. It can become second nature to the students and doesn’t have to be something to be feared. Parents can help their students in similar endeavors.
Texting also works well in teaching poetry and how to summarize it. Some texting verges on poetry itself, and this is not lost on the students who use it.
Taking short notes on reading assignments is greatly facilitated by texting. These notes could be shared with classmates or simply sent to oneself to review before a test or quiz.
Radios, talking movies, cars, television, telephones, electric typewriters, and early computers were either once feared when they were introduced and/or not expected to stay around very long. We have learned from history that this technology march will go on and accelerate as it does. We can close our eyes to it, or embrace it and help tailor it to the needs of our children and students. There is much these digital natives can teach us digital tourists about the world into which they were born.
* * *
Jason Schwager
9:51 am on Sunday, July 31, 2011
Interesting article. Congratulations on your accommodating change. I strongly caution against transforming poetry into txt. LOL. Poetry is about more than ideas. It carries allusion and subtleties easily lost with "translating" or worse "summarizing". Yikes! RU /me?
From äppäräti, please forgive brevity.
William Xifaras
8:09 am on Monday, August 1, 2011
Text messaging is a certainly a double-edged sword. Quick and easy, but deteriorates any formal writing skills. Not to mention, the constant interruptions to the workday & time consumption.
Ian Chia
4:30 pm on Thursday, August 11, 2011
You may be interested in a longitudinal study done by the University of Coventry, UK on the effects of texting in literacy.
>>>
Children who are heavy users of mobile phone text abbreviations such as LOL (laughing out loud), plz (please), l8ter (later) and xxx (kisses), are unlikely to be problem spellers and readers, a new study funded by the British Academy has found.
The research...revealed that levels of “textism” use could even be used to predict reading ability and phonological awareness in each pupil by the end of the year.
Moreover, the proportion of textisms used was observed to increase with age, from just 21% of Year 4 pupils to 47% in Year 6, revealing that more sophisticated literacy skills are needed for textism use.
The theory behind the research, carried out by Dr Clare Wood, Reader in Developmental Psychology at Coventry University, relates to one of the early developing skills associated with (and believed to underpin) successful reading and spelling development. ‘Phonological awareness’ refers to a child’s ability to detect, isolate and manipulate patterns of sound in speech. For example, children who can tell which words rhyme, or what word is left if you remove a letter, have particularly high levels of phonological awareness.
<<<
Overview: http://www.coventry.ac.uk/newsandeventsarchive/a/5695/$/selectedYearId/1410/selectedMonthId/1411/tab/news
Research results: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02002.x/abstract
Betty Buginas
4:51 pm on Thursday, August 11, 2011
Thanks, Ian. It is interesting to see research on this and amazing to think someone has had time to do a longitudinal study on texting. I'm still puzzled as to how "l8ter" can be an abbreviation for "later" though, given that it's the same length but contains a more difficult keystroke.
Charles Burress
12:11 am on Friday, August 12, 2011
Very interesting! This study and Betty's comment make me wonder if texting, having escaped the confines of grammar and orthodox spelling, also can help some, perhaps many, students discover the joy of creative expression with written language, a pleasure that they can retain and later adapt when switching back to standard English. I suspect texting is not always guided by the fewest and easiest keystrokes but also by the fun, or pun, of playing with sounds and spelling, as in "l8ter."