After 20 Years, Schools Could Be Freed From State Loan Payments, Trustee
Board President Charles Ramsey said the plan for ending the West Contra Costa school district's debt is historic and could mean more than $1 million added to the budget this year alone.
In addition to the issues that have beleaguered schools throughout the country, and in California and urban districts in particular, the West Contra Costa Unified School District has had an extra burden to bear. For the past 20 years it has been paying off a loan from the state. But now the district could soon be free of that financial burden as well as a state-appointed trustee who keeps an eye on spending at a cost of $75,000 a year in district funds.
The district has determined that it can pay off the remaining $9 million it owes on the loan by using the $9 million Debt Service Account it was obliged by the trustee to keep, thus not only eliminating the debt but also keeping the $1.5 million in interest it would owe for the current fiscal year, according to Richmond City Councilman Tom Butt, who reported the news in his email forum Sunday.
Butt told Patch that his email item was based on information from school board President Charles Ramsey and school district staff. See below for his full message, which he labeled, "Explosive Financial News from the WCCUSD - State Debt Can Be Retired Now!"
If approved, the plan would remove a heavy financial burden imposed on the district two decades ago. Since Walter Marks played fast and free with district funds during his stint as superintendent, the district has had to devote precious money each year toward paying off a state bail-out loan and interest. Mark’s System For Choice had children as young as first grade wandering the halls of elementary schools looking for their next elective and saw spending on items like video cameras and darkroom equipment to support those electives.
By 1991, the district was planning to end the school year early because it was out of money. A lawsuit — by Butt — kept the schools open, but at a cost. The district ended up with a loan from the state that it has been paying off ever since.
School board president Charles Ramsey called the news historic.
“The community and voters are finally getting local control back after 20 years,” he said. “I want to thank everyone for sticking with the district and working hard to put this ugly chapter behind us.”
Ramsey said the district could gain more than $1 million this school year alone.
"Since 1991, our school district has labored under a significant handicap that has resulted in fewer of our precious financial resources being spent on the education of our children,” said former school board member Glen Price, who worked for years on the issue. “Over the years, thousands of students, parents, teachers, WCCUSD staff, civic leaders and community members have worked to have this unjust burden removed. I applaud this new initiative being undertaken by our school board and superintendent."
One of those who assisted West Contra Costa over the years in getting more favorable terms on the loan was Tom Torlakson, who represented most of the district during his eight years in the state Senate and has also served in the state Assembly. The district will now be looking to Torlakson in his new role as the state superintendent of public instruction to approve the plan.
“Getting out from under the consequences of past mistakes is a long time coming,” said school board member Madeline Kronenberg. “Our students and district have been burdened by this debt for many, many years. I am both excited and relieved to see the end of the road at last. My hope is that everyone (all our city councils and our state representatives) joins with us and we all advocate together to Tom Torlakson to expedite the process to set us free — at last.”
Todd Groves, a parent and active volunteer in El Cerrito schools, praised Ramsey and others for their tenacity in getting to this point.
“Lord knows that I’ve been scathing on many issues, but this is a major WCCUSD accomplishment, especially given the times,” Groves wrote on a local education email forum. “Hats off to leadership and the many individuals that have contributed to this day.”
Butt spread the news through his long-running email forum, which includes a mix of his own point of view with a steady supply of West County news, often forwarded from other sources. Here is the text of his message Sunday:
Twenty years after the State of California unfairly saddled future generations of children in the WCCUSD with penalties for the sins of a former superintendent, the current school board, along with Superintendent Harter, has found a way to finally jettison what has been a staggering debt and the burden of a state trustee.
When what was then the Richmond Unified School District went broke in 1991 and closed the schools early, several parents successfully sued to keep the schools open. The California Supreme Court decision in the resulting litigation, Butt v. State of California, was wildly successful in opening schools back up and setting future constitutional issues regarding educational policy in California, but it also resulted in a vindictive and punitive financial burden imposed by the losers, in this case former Governor Pete Wilson.
Butt v. State of California, 842 P.2d 1240 (Cal. 1992).
The California Supreme Court ruled that the state was responsible for the fundamental educational rights of students and that the state must take action to address a local district's inability to provide an education basically equivalent to that provided by other districts in the state. In so ruling, the Court stated that the California State Constitution makes public education “a fundamental concern of the State and prohibits maintenance and operation of the common public school system in a way which denies basic educational equality to the students of particular districts. The State itself bears the ultimate authority and responsibility to ensure that its district-based system of common schools provides basic equality of educational opportunity.”842 P.2d at 1251.
Millions of dollars have been siphoned off the WCCUSD budget every year to repay the $35 million loan, and the children of West County have suffered mightily. Now the WCCUSD board, led by Charles Ramsey, has found a way to not only throw off that oppressive debt but to use the savings to increase this year’s instructional budget.
The remaining balance on the state loan is $9 million, and the District had budgeted $1.5 million for debt service this fiscal year (The interest rate charged by the state is also usurious and vindictive). It turns out that the District had been required by the state trustee to maintain a $9 million Debt Service Account. Adding that $9 million to the $1.5 million already budgeted for interest, the District has $10.5 million available to pay off a $9 million debt! The $1.5 savings can go back into the classroom.
The only condition is that State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Tom Torlakson, must approve. The District will soon be making this request, and it is hard to imagine reason why Torlakson would not consent.
In a related matter, the District also pays the $75,000 annual salary of the state-appointed trustee. Once the debt is paid off, the trustee should also go away, along with his $75,000 compensation, but this also requires Torlakson’s approval.
Ramsey will soon be looking for widespread support from District residents and City Councils within the District to petition Torlakson to let WCCUSD finally end this travesty.
Ramsey is also looking at restructuring the District's debt on some old Certificates of Participation (COPs), which could save another $100,000 annually.
Despite the burden of the loan debt and devastating state funding shortfalls, the WCCUSD remains in remarkably good fiscal health, particularly in its capital program. The District’s bonds are currently rated at higher levels on an aggregate basis than at any other time in the past twenty years. This is a reflection of the relative strength of the District’s tax base, the relative wealth levels of District residents, the relative strength of the District’s financial performance, and the relatively high debt burden.
In another financial coup for the District, on August 10, the District took a bond refunding bond deal to market, a culmination of a great deal of planning and work by our Bond Finance Team. The market conditions were very favorable for Municipal Bonds , and this refunding has saved the local taxpayers over $7 million. Part of what drove increased investor interest was the improvement in ratings. The upgrade from Standard & Poor’s leaves the District’s bonds with ratings of “Aa3” from Moody’s and “A+” from Standard & Poor’s and Fitch.
The refunding bond transaction was a tremendous success from a variety of perspectives. Taxpayer savings achieved were nearly twice the levels targeted and discussed just two weeks previous to the sale. Tax rates on the 2002 Measure D bonds will remain at least close to targeted levels for the next two years. The possibility that tax rates on the 2000 Measure M bonds will increase greatly within the next five years has been significantly reduced (though not eliminated). Perhaps most importantly, the District’s bond program continues to move in the right direction with regard to bond ratings and appeal to investors.
(Butt's web site includes a link for those wishing to subscribe to his E-Forum.)
Susan D.Keeffe
7:38 am on Monday, August 22, 2011
Congratulations! This is amazing news. The WCCUSD Superintendent and staff are to be commended on their fiscal due diligence. This is a real benefit to the students. The teachers can never recover the lost 9 percent in pay cuts which lasted 5 years, but knowing those funds can now go where they belong, to the schools,is a remarkable achievement.
Chris Wimmer
9:13 am on Monday, August 22, 2011
We HAD fiscal mismanagement that got us into this trouble in the first place. Lets continue to be frugal and keep our money where it belongs. Cudo's to the WCCUSD. Now lets get on with not only beautifying the outside of our schools, but get to REAL education INSIDE our schools. Nice to see "pretty" schools... BETTER to see EDUCATED students that can make a difference in the world.
Annie R.
10:41 am on Monday, August 22, 2011
No more parcel taxes and bond measures! Let the existing measures sunset.
Irene Rojas-Carroll
11:19 am on Monday, August 22, 2011
As I wrote in an email to Mr. Ramsey: Wow! This has obviously been a very challenging and complex process. I hope that the loan payoff, the trustee situation, and the debt restructuring all work out. Thank you for sending out some hope when most news about public schools is beyond bleak. It keeps my thoughts optimistic and renews my resolve to fight for educational justice.
I agree with Chris - just because we might be free of this debt soon does NOT mean we should go into a spending free-for-all and stop seeking parcel taxes and bond measures. If we rest on our laurels, the same kinds of mistakes could happen again. The education of our students is too valuable to play around with. Keep funding our local schools!
Marty
11:38 am on Monday, August 22, 2011
Boys and girls,
Let's begin the school year with a multiple choice exam. Which of these statements is true:
1. a
2. b
3. both a and b
4. Who knows. WCCUSD's board, local politicians, and their campaign contributors
have created a black hole from which only disinformation and spin emanate. Local media are largely unwilling or unable to shed light on their conduct and inform the taxpayers and voters.
a) "This is a reflection of the relative strength of the District’s tax base, the relative wealth levels of District residents, the relative strength of the District’s financial performance, and the relatively high debt burden. " (Councilmmeber Butt's message quoted in the EC Patch 22 Aug 2011)
b) "More than two-thirds of all students are eligible under federal guidelines for free or reduced lunches – an indicator of socioeconomic disadvantage." (WCCUSD website homepage, accessed 22 Aug 2011)
Bea Lieberman
11:46 am on Monday, August 22, 2011
Now is a great opportunity to show some respect to our long term teachers. (Those who have worked more than 20 years). Long term teachers have had the lowest salaries around for years, especially after out 9% pay cut in 1991. True, we will not recover our tremendous losses, but now we can, at least, increase teacher pay. (I've heard, but can't verify, that out of approximately 150 districts in CA, we are third from the bottom in salary). It's also important to understand that retirement compensation is based on salary. A low salary equals a low retirement. Teachers in districts around us can retire on a great deal more. It's one thing to not be well compensated for work while we are able to manage, but when we are old, and perhaps ill, it's a shame to not have enough to cover our needs. Our health benefits have also been capped and predicted to increase by 10% a year. The district now has more capability of compensating long term teachers fairly. Our salaries should be raised to competitive levels. Only a one year raise to levels equal to other teachers in CA would allow us to retire with some dignity. Remember, those families with only one income suffer the most! I propose that the district raise the salaries of those teachers who have dedicated their lives working with our WCCUSD children. In the past, we boosted the new teacher salaries, and now it's time for some equity for the older folks!
Marty
1:36 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011
I agree. Our teachers are underpaid relative to their peers. This is a high cost area, and many of our schools are "challenging" environments in which to work. We have a half dozen or more administrators making $150K+ --let's do right by the teachers, too. The good teachers who have devoted their professional careers to our children should not be sent into retirement struggling financially, and the bright young ones should not be lured away by neighboring districts because they can't afford to live here. However, their union must be receptive to changes, accountability, and weeding out the few bad apples in their ranks.
Valerie Snider
12:22 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011
What, exactly, did Ramsey do? The district owed $9 million, and they had $9 million set aside already. What magic did he perform? (I assume the debt service money was set aside because of the involvement of the trustee.)
Does this guy deserve a pat on the back because he complied with the terms of the loan?
Ira Sharenow
3:59 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011
Data on teacher pay (and other data)
http://www.wccusd.net/2277106213343997/lib/2277106213343997/SARC/2009%20-%202010/English/110407_2009-10_English_SARC_El_Cerrito_Senior_HS.pdf Page 8
http://www.ed-data.k12.ca.us/App_Resx/EdDataClassic/fsTwoPanel.aspx?#!bottom=/_layouts/EdDataClassic/fiscal/TeacherSalary.asp?tab=0&level=06&ReportNumber=4096&County=7&fyr=0910&District=61796
WCC
Teacher with BA+60: $56,915
Family Plan Health Insurance: $12,036
Acalanes
Teacher with BA+60: $70,148
Family Plan Health Insurance: $16,616
Albany
Teacher with BA+60: $62,305
Family Plan Health Insurance: $19,936
Jackie Fonken
4:31 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011
As a past student, volunteer (15 yrs) and an employee for 21+ years, now retired I almost feel teary eyed that something so positive is finally happened to this school district. I hope there is never another mistake such as hiring someone like Walter Marks. If the WCCUSD will always keep the roofs of all our new and rebuilt schools in good repair maybe we will also have a big savings on all school repairs over the next 20 year.Thanks to everyone that have been working on doing what is necessary to pay off this painful debt and take advantage of other opportunties to save money.
Valerie Snider
4:59 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011
I believe the district still owes $1 or $2 million dollars to IBM for computers that were purchased during the Marks regime. The story that I heard is that they were obsolete by the time they were delivered. They were never used.
So the district is not debt-free, as far as I know.